4.0 Article

Advances in Bone Marrow Imaging: Strengths and Limitations from a Clinical Perspective

Journal

SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 3-21

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761612

Keywords

Dixon; diffusion-weighted imaging; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging; dual-energy computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes that conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred technique for imaging bone marrow, but new MRI techniques and nuclear medicine techniques have emerged in recent decades. The technical bases of these methods are presented in relation to common physiological and pathological processes involving the bone marrow. The strengths and limitations of these imaging methods are discussed, as well as their added value compared to conventional imaging in assessing non-neoplastic disorders. The potential usefulness of these methods in differentiating between benign and malignant bone marrow lesions is also discussed, along with the limitations hindering their widespread use in clinical practice.
Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the modality of choice to image bone marrow. However, the last few decades have witnessed the emergence and development of novel MRI techniques, such as chemical shift imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and whole-body MRI, as well as spectral computed tomography and nuclear medicine techniques. We summarize the technical bases behind these methods, in relation to the common physiologic and pathologic processes involving the bone marrow. We present the strengths and limitations of these imaging methods and consider their added value compared with conventional imaging in assessing non-neoplastic disorders like septic, rheumatologic, traumatic, and metabolic conditions. The potential usefulness of these methods to differentiate between benign and malignant bone marrow lesions is discussed. Finally, we consider the limitations hampering a more widespread use of these techniques in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available