4.7 Article

Antimicrobial Efficacy Assessment and Rheological Investigation of Two Different Hand Sanitizers Compared with the Standard Reference WHO Formulation 1

Journal

GELS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels9020108

Keywords

alcohol-based hand sanitizer; ABHS; rheology; organoleptic features; antimicrobial activity; MIC; MBC; agar diffusion test; in vitro; in vivo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the frequent use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers has necessitated a careful evaluation of their stability and effectiveness. This study focused on the characterization and rheological behavior of the hand sanitizers, confirming their good stability in gel formula compared to the liquid formula. The antimicrobial assessment also showed the efficacy of both formulations in vitro and in vivo. Overall, our study presents a valid quality control assessment for ensuring the stability and efficacy of alcohol-based hand sanitizers.
(1) Background: recently, the use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHSs) has become very frequent, and an evaluation of the stability and effectiveness of their formulations is a critical topic which should be carefully considered. (2) Methods: starting from the characterization of the hand sanitizers object of the study, our interest was focused on their rheological behavior in order to confirm their intrinsic features, but also the stability of each formulation in different conditions of shear and temperature; the second aspect concerns the antimicrobial assessment through a panel of in vitro and in vivo experimental trials. (3) Results: rheological investigation confirmed good stability for the two hand sanitizers in gel formula with respect to the reference in liquid formula; the antimicrobial activity evaluation showed good efficacy of each formulation both in vitro and in vivo. (4) Conclusions: altogether, our overview presents a valid quality control assessment to ensure the stability and efficacy of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available