4.1 Article

Patient and Healthcare Professional Priorities for a Mobile Phone Application for Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CUREUS INC
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33993

Keywords

peripheral vascular surgery; digital health technology; home-based exercise; mobile apps (mhealth); peripheral arterial disease (pad)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate patient, public, and healthcare professional priorities regarding a dedicated mobile phone application for remote SET delivery. The majority of patients were interested in monitoring their therapy and measuring walking distances, as well as watching exercise videos. Healthcare professionals prioritized a communication platform, recording other forms of physical activity, and using wearable technology. The ability to interact with other users was not prioritized by either group.
Introduction Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is the first-line treatment for the peripheral arterial disease (PAD), however, access and compliance are low. An alternative method of delivering this therapy is through mobile health applications, which can be more accessible and convenient for patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient, public and healthcare professional (HCP) priorities with regard to a dedicated mobile phone application to deliver remote SET. Methods Bespoke questionnaires were designed for patients and HCPs to assess app functionality and prioritisations for development. These were distributed through social media and the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. Results Functionality questionnaires were completed by 62 patients and 44 HCPs. Eighty-four per cent of patients wanted their therapy to be monitored by their vascular team with the majority (78%) interested in measuring walking distances. Most patients (76%) were interested in watching exercise videos. These views were shared by HCPs. A communication platform was prioritised for messaging and pictures by the patient (74% and 68% respectively), but not so by HCPs (40%). Documenting other forms of physical activity and the use of wearable technology was less valuable to patients but favoured by HCPs (50%). The ability to interact with other users was not prioritised by either group. Conclusion Delivery of a mobile phone application to deliver health programmes for SET in patients with PAD is an acceptable method for patients and HCPs. This data will enable the next stages of mobile phone application development to be appropriately prioritised, focusing on building exercise videos, a communication platform and further walking tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available