4.6 Article

Reliability and measurement error of anterior maximum voluntary bite force in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and healthy children

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280763

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the reliability of AMVBF in children with JIA and healthy children. The results showed that AMVBF measurements have good to excellent reliability in children with JIA and moderate to excellent reliability in healthy children. Values above 11.4N might be a clinically relevant change over time in children with JIA.
In children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can be involved. As a consequence, the oral function can be impaired due to joint and/or muscle involvement of the masticatory system with a negative influence on the maximum bite force. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to establish the reliability of AMVBF in children with JIA and healthy children. Children with JIA and healthy children conducted three attempts of AMVBF. The reliability of AMVBF measurement was determined by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) by age, standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), and limits of agreement (LoA). A total of 298 children with JIA and 168 healthy children were examined. The AMVBF measurements showed an good to excellent reliability in children with JIA based on the ICCs corrected for age (0.782-0.979). In healthy children, the reliability was moderate to excellent (0.546-0.999). The SDC in our study indicated that values above 11.4N might be a clinical relevant change over time in children with JIA. The LoA showed a wide spread of variability in both children with JIA (-72.6-44.4N) and healthy children (-79.9-72.8N). The Bland-Altman plots indicated that the differences between the test and retest increased in value proportionally to the biteforce value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available