4.7 Article

The hubble rate trouble: an effective field theory of dark matter

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11366-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hubble constant derived from the 6-parameter fit to the CMB power spectrum contradicts the value obtained from direct measurements via type Ia supernova and Cepheids observations. We propose a mechanism involving effective operators that produce relativistic dark matter particles at early times, increasing the number of relativistic degrees of freedom. This mechanism can raise the value of the Hubble constant derived from CMB and reconcile discrepancies between local and CMB probes. By itself, it can increase H-0 up to 70 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), and with the addition of a Phantom-like cosmology, reach H-0 ? 71-73 km s(-1)Mpc(-1). We also outline the parameter space that reproduces H-0? 71-73 km s(-1) Mpc(-1) while satisfying all relevant constraints.
The Hubble constant inferred from the 6-parameter fit to the CMB power spectrum conflicts with the value obtained from direct measurements via type Ia supernova and Cepheids observations. We write down effective operators involving spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1 dark matter that lead to the relativistic production of dark matter particles at early times, and consequently lead to an increase in the number of relativistic degrees of freedom. This mechanism which is amenable to CMB, BBN, and structure formation observables can sufficiently raise the value of the Hubble constant derived from CMB and reconcile local and CMB probes of the Hubble constant. This mechanism alone increases H-0 up to 70 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), and with the help of a Phantom-like cosmology, reach H-0 ? 71-73 km s(-1)Mpc(-1). Lastly, we outline the region of parameter space which reproduces H-0? 71-73 km s(-1) Mpc(-1) while obeying all relevant constraints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available