4.8 Article

Stereoselective synthesis of [2.2]triphenylenophanes via intramolecular double [2+2+2] cycloadditions

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages 3963-3972

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3sc00571b

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the enantio- and/or diastereoselective synthesis of planar chiral polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-based [2.2]cyclophanes via base-mediated intermolecular macrocyclization and Rh- or Ni-catalyzed intramolecular double [2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions. DFT calculations reveal that the diastereoselectivity is kinetically determined by the second [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses confirm the repulsion between the facing triphenylene or [5]helicene skeletons, leading to curved structures with bulged centers.
Planar chiral [2.2]cyclophanes with two aromatic rings in close proximity have attracted much attention for their applications as chiral materials and catalysts because of their stable chirality and transannular interactions. Although numerous [2.2]cyclophanes have been synthesized to date, only a few polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-based ones have been reported, and the simultaneous control of two planar chiralities of the two aromatic rings facing each other has not been achieved. Here we report the enantio- and/or diastereoselective synthesis of planar chiral PAH-based [2.2]cyclophanes ([2.2]triphenylenophanes) via the high-yielding base-mediated intermolecular macrocyclization and Rh- or Ni-catalyzed intramolecular double [2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions. DFT calculations have revealed that the second [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition kinetically determines the diastereoselectivity. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses have confirmed that the facing triphenylene or [5]helicene skeletons strongly repel each other, resulting in curved structures with bulged centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available