3.8 Article

THE SITUATION IN ACROBATIC GYMNASTICS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Journal

SCIENCE OF GYMNASTICS JOURNAL
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 47-64

Publisher

UNIV LJUBLJANA

Keywords

acrobatic gymnastics; bibliometric analysis; scientific production

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to provide a static picture of the scientific research development in acrobatic gymnastics by collecting information about the main contributors, investigation topics, publication dynamics, and cooperative networks. The results suggest a lack of interest in the investigation of balance and pyramid balance, which are major features of acrobatic gymnastics.
Since acrobatic gymnastics is a recent, only a few decades old gymnastics discipline, it is not yet much explored as a scientific research field. Despite its increasing popularity, and while science mapping has become an essential activity for all scientific disciplines, no bibliometric analysis on this topic was available. Therefore, this study aims to provide a static picture of the scientific research development in acrobatic gymnastics by collecting information about the main contributors as well as the main investigation topics, the publication dynamics and cooperative networks. A search conducted in the Web of Science and Scopus databases retrieved 37 journal articles between 2001-2021. Results suggest that the year of 2015 was a milestone for scientific research in acrobatic gymnastics since it marked the beginning of the dominance of authors from Spain, followed by Poland and Portugal. Countries are generally focused on their own territory and there is a limited scientific collaboration between different nations. The Spanish and the Polish research institutions are leading publishing in this sport. As a reference for future studies, our results suggest that although balance was identified as the niche investigation topic, there has been a lack of interest for the pyramids balance, which is a major feature of acrobatic gymnastics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available