4.7 Article

Model estimates of metazoans' contributions to the biological carbon pump

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 997-1009

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-20-997-2023

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The daily vertical migrations of fish and other metazoans contribute significantly to the carbon sequestration by the biological pump. Using a game-theoretic food-web model, we estimate global carbon fluxes and sequestration by fish and zooplankton. The carbon sequestered by fish and multicellular zooplankton is conservatively more than 50% of the estimated global total and has a longer sequestration timescale than previously reported.
The daily vertical migrations of fish and other metazoans actively transport organic carbon from the ocean surface to depth, contributing to the biological carbon pump. We use an oxygen-constrained, game-theoretic food-web model to simulate diel vertical migrations and estimate near-global (global ocean minus coastal areas and high latitudes) carbon fluxes and sequestration by fish and zooplankton due to respiration, fecal pellets, and deadfalls. Our model provides estimates of the carbon export and sequestration potential for a range of pelagic functional groups, despite uncertain biomass estimates of some functional groups. While the export production of metazoans and fish is modest (& SIM;20 % of global total), we estimate that their contribution to carbon sequestered by the biological pump (similar to 800 PgC) is conservatively more than 50 % of the estimated global total (similar to 1300 PgC) and that they have a significantly longer sequestration timescale (similar to 250 years) than previously reported for other components of the biological pump. Fish and multicellular zooplankton contribute about equally to this sequestered carbon pool. This essential ecosystem service could be at risk from both unregulated fishing on the high seas and ocean deoxygenation due to climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available