4.6 Article

Correlation Between Retinal Vessel Diameters and Uveitis Activity

Journal

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.3.13

Keywords

uveitis; intraocular inflammation; retina; vessels; veins; diameter; vasculature; infectious uveitis; non-infectious uveitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the changes in retinal vein and artery diameters during active and inactive intraocular inflammation in eyes with uveitis. The results showed that active inflammation could influence the diameters of retinal veins and arteries, but they decreased when the inflammation wore off.
PURPOSE. To assess retinal vein and artery diameters during active and inactive intraocular inflammation in eyes with uveitis.METHODS. Color fundus photographs and clinical data of eyes with uveitis collected during two visits (active disease [i.e., T0] and inactive stage [i.e., T1]) were reviewed. The images were semi-automatically analyzed to obtain the central retina vein equivalent (CRVE) and central retina artery equivalent (CRAE). Changes of CRVE and CRAE from T0 to T1 were calculated, and their possible correlation with clinical data, including age, gender, ethnicity, uveitis etiology, and visual acuity, were investigated.RESULTS. Eighty-nine eyes were enrolled in the study. Both CRVE and CRAE reduced from T0 to T1 (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.01, respectively), with active inflammation being able to influence the CRVE and CRAE (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively) after accounting for all other variables. The degree of venular (AV) and arteriolar (AA) dilation was influenced only by time (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Best-corrected visual acuity was influenced by time and ethnicity (P = 0.003 and P = 0.0006).CONCLUSIONS. CRVE and CRAE are increased in eyes with active intraocular inflammation regardless of the type of uveitis, and they decrease when the inflammation wears off.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available