4.3 Article

Increase in biomass and bioactive compounds in lettuce under various ratios of red to far-red LED light supplemented with blue LED light

Journal

HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 139-147

Publisher

KOREAN SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-016-0133-6

Keywords

closed-type plant production systems; epidermal cell; light quality

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to analyze the growth and bioactive compounds of lettuce in response to far-red LED light supplemented with a combination of red and blue LED light. Sixteen-day-old red leaf lettuce seedlings were transplanted to a growth chamber equipped with red, blue, and far-red LEDs. After setting the ratio of blue (B) to red (R) LEDs to 2:8, the ratio of R to far-red (FR) LEDs was adjusted to 0.7, 1.2, 4.1, or 8.6 (B+R/FR 0.7, 1.2, 4.1, or 8.6). Additionally, plants were irradiated with combined B and R LEDs (B+R) and fluorescent lamps (control) for 24 days. Growth characteristics including cell division rate, epidermal cell density and thickness, and antioxidant phenolic compounds were measured. Supplementation with FR LED light improved shoot and root growth compared to plants under B+R and control treatment. B+R/FR 1.2 treatment resulted in the highest shoot fresh weight and leaf area on day 24 of treatment. Obvious activation of the G2M phase was not observed in plants under far-red treatment, and most far-red treatments besides B+R/FR 4.1 increased the epidermal cell size. Plants treated with B+R/FR ratios of only 0.7 and 1.2 had significantly higher total phenolic levels, antioxidant activity, chlorogenic acid contents, and caffeic acid contents per plant than the control. These results suggest that supplementing the existing visual light spectrum, such as red and blue light, with far-red LEDs improves lettuce growth and bioactive compound content in a closed-type plant production system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available