4.6 Article

Unraveling the device performance differences between bulk-heterojunction and single-component polymer solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages 8961-8971

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta00690e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The device performance of polymer solar cells (PSCs) is closely related to the microstructure of the active layer. Using a conjugated-block copolymer (CBC) as the active layer, we compared its photovoltaic performance with that of the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) system. Although both systems show high device efficiencies, the contributions of relevant photovoltaic parameters are different. Our work demonstrates that CBC materials are promising for reducing the efficiency-stability gap of PSCs, compared to BHJ systems.
The device performance, including efficiency and stability, of polymer solar cells (PSCs) is mainly correlated with the bulk microstructure of specific active layer systems. Generally, developing a single-component (SC) active layer is an effective approach to solving the inherent shortcomings of bulk heterojunctions (BHJs). Herein, we designed and synthesized a conjugated-block copolymer (CBC) PBDB-YTCl-2 and further compared the photovoltaic performance of the CBC PBDB-YTCl-2 and BHJ PBDB-T:PYCl-2 systems. Although both PSC systems show high device efficiencies of over 13%, the contributions of relevant photovoltaic parameters are quite different. We systematically evaluated multiple target parameters, including morphological characteristics, physical kinetics, and active layer stability issues, and compared the correlations and differences between the photovoltaic systems, blend morphology, and device performance of the corresponding CBC and BHJ systems. Our work demonstrates that CBC materials are promising active layer systems, which are conducive to the reduced efficiency-stability gap of PSCs in comparison to the corresponding BHJ all-polymer systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available