4.5 Review

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17588359231163798

Keywords

chemotherapy; immunotherapy; lung cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; non-small-cell lung cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has led to the exploration of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several phase II trials have demonstrated the benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with radiation or chemotherapy. These trials have shown high rates of pathologic response and improved surgical outcomes. The CheckMate-816 trial definitively established the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC.
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has pushed the treatment paradigm for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) toward neoadjuvant therapy. A growing number of promising trials have examined the utility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, both alone and in combination with other modalities such as radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy. The phase II LCMC3 and NEOSTAR trials demonstrated a role for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in inducing meaningful pathologic responses, and another phase II trial established the feasibility of combining neoadjuvant durvalumab with RT. Significant interest in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy resulted in the conduct of multiple successful phase II trials including the Columbia trial, NADIM, SAKK 16/14, and NADIM II. Across these trials, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy led to high rates of pathologic response and improved surgical outcomes without compromising surgical timing or feasibility. CheckMate-816, which was a randomized phase III trial studying neoadjuvant nivolumab in addition to chemotherapy, definitively established a benefit for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC. Despite the growing literature and success of these trials, several outstanding questions remain, including the relationship between pathologic response and patient survival, the role of biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 and circulating tumor DNA in determining patient selection and treatment course, and the utility of additional adjuvant therapies. Longer follow-up of CheckMate-816 and other ongoing phase III trials may help address these questions. Ultimately, the complexity of managing resectable NSCLC highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available