4.3 Article

Latitudinal Clines of the Human Vitamin D Receptor and Skin Color Genes

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 1251-1266

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.026773

Keywords

epistasis; skin color; vitamin D; linkage disequilibrium; network analysis; adaptation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P50-GM65509, R01-GM100364, RC1-AR058681]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-0743797]
  3. Agencia Gestio Ajuts Universitaris i Recerca [2009-SGR-31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The well-documented latitudinal clines of genes affecting human skin color presumably arise from the need for protection from intense ultraviolet radiation (UVR) vs. the need to use UVR for vitamin D synthesis. Sampling 751 subjects from a broad range of latitudes and skin colors, we investigated possible multilocus correlated adaptation of skin color genes with the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR), using a vector correlation metric and network method called BlocBuster. We discovered two multilocus networks involving VDR promoter and skin color genes that display strong latitudinal clines as multilocus networks, even though many of their single gene components do not. Considered one by one, the VDR components of these networks show diverse patterns: no cline, a weak declining latitudinal cline outside of Africa, and a strong in-vs. out-of-Africa frequency pattern. We confirmed these results with independent data from HapMap. Standard linkage disequilibrium analyses did not detect these networks. We applied BlocBuster across the entire genome, showing that our networks are significant outliers for interchromosomal disequilibrium that overlap with environmental variation relevant to the genes' functions. These results suggest that these multilocus correlations most likely arose from a combination of parallel selective responses to a common environmental variable and coadaptation, given the known Mendelian epistasis among VDR and the skin color genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available