4.0 Article

Thermal behavior of schorl up to breakdown temperature at room pressure

Journal

PERIODICO DI MINERALOGIA
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 23-32

Publisher

SAPIENZA UNIV EDITRICE
DOI: 10.13133/2239-1002/17859

Keywords

Schorl; HT-pXRD; thermal expansion; iron oxidation; deprotonation; intracrystalline cations exchange; structural breakdown

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through in-situ powder X-ray diffraction (in situ pXRD), the breakdown temperature of schorl with the richest Fe2+ content was determined to be 850 degrees Celsius, with the first appearance of hematite and dominant B-mullite phase. The breakdown process was completed at 950 degrees Celsius, with no residual tourmaline found. Annealing the schorl at 450 degrees Celsius in air resulted in the oxidation of Fe, counterbalanced by the deprotonation reaction.
Schorl is one of the most widespread tourmaline compositions in the world, known from many different geological settings. Its role as boron and water carrier has been moderately investigated together with its stability field. In this study, the richest schorl in Fe2+ content was investigated to constraint its breakdown temperature at room pressure through in situ powder X-Ray Diffraction (in situ pXRD), its breakdown products and the coupled thermally induced dehydrogenation-dehydrogenation process experienced approaching the breakdown conditions.Schorl turned out to begin its breakdown at 850 degrees C with the first appearance of hematite, followed by a dominant B-mullite phase. The breakdown reaction of schorl can be expressed as follows: 2NaFe2+3Al6(BO3)3Si6O18(OH)=3Fe2O3+4/3Al9Si2BO19+(Na-Si -B-rich) glass+4H2O.The breakdown process is completed at 950 degrees C, when no trace of residual tourmaline is found. Annealing the schorl at 450 degrees C in air was enough to set the Fe oxidation out, counterbalanced by the deprotonation reaction: (Fe2+)+(OH)- -> (Fe3+)+ (O2-)+1/2H2(g).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available