4.6 Review

Review of Sparse Representation-Based Classification Methods on EEG Signal Processing for Epilepsy Detection, Brain-Computer Interface and Cognitive Impairment

Journal

FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00172

Keywords

sparse representation-based classification; sparse representation; EEG signal; preclinical mild cognitive impairment; mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; epilepsy; brain computer interface

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61503326, 81271422]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M581317]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province in China [F2016203343]
  4. Doctorial Foundation of Yanshan University in China [B900]
  5. Science and Technology Support Programme of Hebei Province in China [13212003]
  6. Test Bank Construction Foundation of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology in China [JYTK201506]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At present, the sparse representation-based classification (SRC) has become an important approach in electroencephalograph (EEG) signal analysis, by which the data is sparsely represented on the basis of a fixed dictionary or learned dictionary and classified based on the reconstruction criteria. SRC methods have been used to analyze the EEG signals of epilepsy, cognitive impairment and brain computer interface (BCI), which made rapid progress including the improvement in computational accuracy, efficiency and robustness. However, these methods have deficiencies in real-time performance, generalization ability and the dependence of labeled sample in the analysis of the EEG signals. This mini review described the advantages and disadvantages of the SRC methods in the EEG signal analysis with the expectation that these methods can provide the better tools for analyzing EEG signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available