3.8 Article

Life Satisfaction in a Clinical and a Nonclinical Group of Older People: The Role of Self-Compassion and Social Support

Journal

GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRIC MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/23337214231164890

Keywords

older adults; life satisfaction; self-compassion; social support; meaning in life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the factors influencing life satisfaction in older individuals with mental health problems and compares them to nonclinical participants. The findings reveal that self-kindness and intimate friends' network significantly contribute to life satisfaction, while family relationships play a significant role among clinical participants. These findings suggest the importance of incorporating self-kindness and rapport with family in clinical interventions to enhance well-being among older adults.
Despite the health-promoting role of life satisfaction, little is known about its determining factors in older people with mental health problems compared to nonclinical participants. This study provides preliminary data into the role of social support, self-compassion, and meaning in life on older people's life satisfaction within both clinical and non-clinical populations. In total, 153 older adults (age >= 60) completed the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), and questions for relational variables. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis revealed that determinants of life satisfaction were self-kindness (B = 2.036, p = .001) and intimate friends' network (B = 2.725, p = .021), while family relationships were found to be significant among the clinical group (B = 4.556, p = .024). Findings are discussed in relation to incorporating self-kindness and rapport with family in clinical work with older adults to better promote their well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available