4.8 Review

Review on supported metal catalysts with partial/porous overlayers for stabilization

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages 8084-8109

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr00287j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterogeneous catalysts of supported metals play a crucial role in the petrochemical industry and the production of bulk or fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Conventional supported metal catalysts often suffer from deactivation, but strategies like complete encapsulation or core-shell arrangements have been explored. This review focuses on the use of partial/porous overlayers to preserve metals and control the accessibility of active sites in catalytic reactions.
Heterogeneous catalysts of supported metals are important for both liquid-phase and gas-phase chemical transformations which underpin the petrochemical sector and manufacture of bulk or fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Conventional supported metal catalysts (SMC) suffer from deactivation resulting from sintering, leaching, coking and so on. Besides the choice of active species (e.g. atoms, clusters, nanoparticles) to maximize catalytic performances, strategies to stabilize active species are imperative for rational design of catalysts, particularly for those catalysts that work under heated and corrosive reaction conditions. The complete encapsulation of metal active species within a matrix (e.g. zeolites, MOFs, carbon, etc.) or core-shell arrangements is popular. However, the use of partial/porous overlayers (PO) to preserve metals, which simultaneously ensures the accessibility of active sites through controlling the size/shape of diffusing reactants and products, has not been systematically reviewed. The present review identifies the key design principles for fabricating supported metal catalysts with partial/porous overlayers (SMCPO) and demonstrates their advantages versus conventional supported metals in catalytic reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available