4.6 Article

Synthesis of transition metal doped lanthanum silicate oxyapatites by a facile co-precipitation method and their evaluation as solid oxide fuel cell electrolytes

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 13, Issue 18, Pages 12285-12294

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra07088j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal doped apatite La10Si6-xCoxO27-delta and La10Si5.2Co0.4Ni0.4O27-delta were synthesized by co-precipitation method followed by sintering. The conductivity of the samples increased with the content of Co2+ doping and was further increased by co-doping of Ni2+. The co-doped sample (La10Si5.2Co0.4Ni0.4O27-delta) exhibited the highest conductivity and achieved the maximum power density, making it a potential electrolyte candidate for solid oxide fuel cell application.
Transition metal doped apatite La10Si6-xCoxO27-delta (x = 0.0; 0.2; 0.8) and La10Si5.2Co0.4Ni0.4O27-delta are synthesized by co-precipitation method followed by sintering. The precursor precipitates and apatite products are characterized by XRD, FTIR, TGA/DTA, Raman Spectroscopy, SEM-EDX and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The presence of apatite phase with hexagonal structure is confirmed through the XRD results. The conductivity measurements of the samples sintered at 1000 degrees C show that the ionic conductivity increases with increasing content of Co2+ doping into apatite that is further increased by co-doping of Ni2+. The Co doped apatite (La10Si5.2Co0.8O27-delta) exhibited conductivity of 1.46 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) while Co-Ni co-doped sample (La10Si5.2Co0.4Ni0.4O27-delta) exhibited highest conductivity of 1.48 x 10(-3) S cm(-1). The maximum power density achieved is also for Co, Ni co-doped sample i.e., 0.65 W cm(-2) at 600 degrees C. The results represented show that Co and Ni enhances the SOFC performance of apatite and makes it potential electrolyte candidate for solid oxide fuel cell application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available