3.8 Article

Salvage Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy for Locally Recurrent T1 and T2 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03773-7

Keywords

Recurrent; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Salvage; Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy in 10 patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). The results demonstrated a local disease-free rate of 40% and an overall survival rate of 50%. Regular endoscopic follow-up is crucial for early detection of recurrence and improving survival.
Assessment of salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). This is a retrospective study of ten rNPC who underwent salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy. Recurrent status for each recurrence was determined before surgery and only recurrent T1 (rT1) and recurrent T2 (rT2) were taken up for surgery after review with radiation oncology colleagues. There were seven rT2 and three rT1 patients. Two patients have undergone simultaneous radical neck dissection (RND) together with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for associated neck nodes. Outcome of the study was done in turn of disease free, disease residual and disease recurrence. Locally disease free and overall survival rates were 40% (4/10) and 50% (5/10) respectively. Locally disease free till the last follow up was achieved in 4 patients while one patient is on palliative chemotherapy post-surgery for locally positive disease for the last three years. Of the four patients that are locally disease free, two patients received chemoradiation (CTRT) post-surgery while two patients only underwent endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for rT1. There were no any major operative complications except nasal crusting. Recurrent T1 and T2 can be manage with endoscopic nasopharyngectomy and post-surgery ctrt should be given in feasible patients. To detect early recurrent and improve the survival, regular endoscopic follow up is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available