4.5 Article

Effects of Internal Exposure of Radioactive 56MnO2 Particles on the Lung in C57BL Mice

Journal

CURRENT ISSUES IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 3208-3218

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cimb45040209

Keywords

residual radiation; internal radiation exposure; radiation injury; lung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The investigation focused on the radiation effects of residual radioactive dust from the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. When studying the effects of manganese dioxide-56 ((MnO2)-Mn-56) on Wistar rats, significant changes were observed in the lungs. To further examine the effects of (MnO2)-Mn-56 in a different species, male C57BL mice were exposed to (MnO2)-Mn-56, stable MnO2 particles, or external gamma-rays.
The investigation of the radiation effects of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki has revealed concerns about the impact of the residual radioactive dust produced in the soil. Manganese-56 is one of the major radioisotopes produced by neutrons from the bomb; hence, we previously examined the biological effects of manganese dioxide-56 ((MnO2)-Mn-56) in Wistar rats, in which significant changes were found in the lung. In the present study, ten-week-old male C57BL mice were exposed to three doses of radioactive (MnO2)-Mn-56, stable MnO2 particles, or external gamma-rays (2 Gy) to further examine the effects of (MnO2)-Mn-56 in a different species. The estimated absorbed radiation doses from (MnO2)-Mn-56 were 26, 96, and 250 mGy in the lung. The animals were examined at 3, 14, and 70 days post exposure. Histologically, no exposure-related changes were found in the lungs of any group. However, pulmonary mRNA expression of aquaporin 1, which is a useful marker for lung pathophysiology, was significantly elevated at 14 and 70 days, although no such changes were found in the mice exposed to external gamma-rays (2 Gy). These data indicated that the inhalation exposure to (MnO2)-Mn-56 particles, with <250 mGy of organ doses, produced significant biological responses in the lung.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available