4.6 Article

Parity, breastfeeding and risk of coronary heart disease: A pan-European case-cohort study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages 1755-1765

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1177/2047487316658571

Keywords

Parity; breastfeeding; Women; coronary heart disease

Funding

  1. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2012-279233]
  2. European Research Council [268834]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0800270, MR/L003120/1, MR/M012190/1]
  4. British Heart Foundation [SP/09/002, RG/08/014, RG13/13/30194]
  5. UK National Institute of Health Research
  6. Regional Government of Asturias
  7. Hellenic Health Foundation
  8. Cancer Research UK [570/A16491]
  9. Sicilian Government
  10. AIRE ONLUS Ragusa
  11. AVIS Ragusa
  12. Swedish Cancer Society
  13. Swedish Scientific Council
  14. Regional Government of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  15. Compagnia di San Paolo
  16. Human Genetics Foundation-Torino (HuGeF)
  17. MRC [G0800270, G0700463, MC_UU_12015/1, MR/L003120/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/014/24067, RG/13/13/30194] Funding Source: researchfish
  19. Cancer Research UK [16491] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. Medical Research Council [G0800270, MC_UU_12015/1, G0700463, MC_PC_13048, MR/L003120/1, MC_U106179471] Funding Source: researchfish
  21. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10135, NF-SI-0512-10165] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective There is uncertainty about the direction and magnitude of the associations between parity, breastfeeding and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We examined the separate and combined associations of parity and breastfeeding practices with the incidence of CHD later in life among women in a large, pan-European cohort study. Methods Data were used from European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-CVD, a case-cohort study nested within the EPIC prospective study of 520,000 participants from 10 countries. Information on reproductive history was available for 14,917 women, including 5138 incident cases of CHD. Using Prentice-weighted Cox regression separately for each country followed by a random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CHD, after adjustment for age, study centre and several socioeconomic and biological risk factors. Results Compared with nulliparous women, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.01-1.41) among parous women; HRs were higher among women with more children (e.g., adjusted HR: 1.95 (95% CI: 1.19-3.20) for women with five or more children). Compared with women who did not breastfeed, the adjusted HR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98) among women who breastfed. For childbearing women who never breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.09-2.30) compared with nulliparous women, whereas for childbearing women who breastfed, the adjusted HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.99-1.43). Conclusion Having more children was associated with a higher risk of CHD later in life, whereas breastfeeding was associated with a lower CHD risk. Women who both had children and breastfed did have a non-significantly higher risk of CHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available