4.7 Article

FENP: A Database of Neonatal Facial Expression for Pain Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 245-254

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3030296

Keywords

Facial expression recognition; neonatal pain; facial expression database

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a new neonatal facial expression database for pain analysis is introduced. The database, called facial expression of neonatal pain (FENP), consists of 11,000 neonatal facial expression images associated with 106 Chinese neonates. The experimental results show that the proposed database is suitable for studying neonatal pain and facial expression recognition.
In this article, we introduce a new neonatal facial expression database for pain analysis. This database, called facial expression of neonatal pain (FENP), contains 11,000 neonatal facial expression images associated with 106 Chinese neonates from two children's hospitals, i.e., the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University and Second Affiliated Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University in China. The facial expression images cover four categories of facial expressions, i.e., severe pain expression, mild pain expression, crying expression and calmness expression, where each category contains 2750 neonatal facial expression images. Based on this database, we also investigate the pain facial expression recognition problem using several state-of-the-art facial expression features and expression recognition methods, such as Gabor+SVM, LBP+SVM, HOG+SVM, LBP+HOG+SVM, and several Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods (including AlexNet, VGGNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet and DenseNet). The experimental results indicate that the proposed neonatal pain facial expression database is very suitable for the study of both neonatal pain and facial expression recognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available