4.8 Article

Accumulated Lattice Strain as an Intrinsic Trigger for the First-Cycle Voltage Decay in Li-Rich 3d Layered Oxides

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages 20200-20207

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c0290720200

Keywords

Li-rich cathodes; voltage decay; lattice strain accumulation; layered structure; operando X-ray diffraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-and Mn-rich layered oxides (LMLOs) are promising cathode materials for Li-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their high discharge capacity. The voltage decay during cycling in LMLOs is attributed to the continuous increase of lattice strain in the bulk material, while some other LMLOs can release the accumulated strain on discharge. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the voltage decay in LMLOs.
Li-and Mn-rich layered oxides (LMLOs) are promising cathode materials for Li-ion batteries (LIBs) owing to their high discharge capacity of above 250 mA h g-1. A high voltage plateau related to the oxidation of lattice oxygen appears upon the first charge, but it cannot be recovered during discharge, resulting in the so-called voltage decay. Disappearance of the honeycomb superstructure of the layered structure at a slow C-rate (e.g., 0.1 C) has been proposed to cause the first-cycle voltage decay. By comparing the structural evolution of Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O2 (LLNMO) at various current densities, the operando synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction results show that the lattice strain in bulk LLNMO is continuously increased over cycling, resulting in the first-cycle voltage loss upon Li-ion insertion. Unlike the LLNMO, the accumulated average lattice strain of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) and LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 (NCM622) from the open-circuit voltage to 4.8 V could be released on discharge. These findings help to gain a deep understanding of the voltage decay in LMLOs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available