4.7 Article

BICePs v2.0: Software for Ensemble Reweighting Using Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 2370-2381

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c012962370J

Keywords

-coupling constants note that the experimental d=2; 5?; but that parameter ?? was ?experimental? distance is black line; CONCLUSION

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations (BICePs) version 2.0 is a free, open-source Python package that reweights theoretical predictions of conformational states using experimental measurements. The latest version of BICePs (v2.0) supports various experimental NMR observables and provides convenient data preparation and processing. It also allows for automatic analysis of sampled posterior and provides coding examples for reference.
Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations (BICePs) version 2.0 (v2.0) is a free, open-source Python package that reweights theoretical predictions of conformational state populations using sparse and/or noisy experimental measurements. In this article, we describe the implementation and usage of the latest version of BICePs (v2.0), a powerful, user-friendly and extensible package which makes several improvements upon the previous version. The algorithm now supports many experimental NMR observables (NOE distances, chemical shifts, J-coupling constants, and hydrogen-deuterium exchange protection factors), and enables convenient data preparation and processing. BICePs v2.0 can perform automatic analysis of the sampled posterior, including visualization, and evaluation of statistical significance and sampling convergence. We provide specific coding examples for these topics, and present a detailed example illustrating how to use BICePs v2.0 to reweight a theoretical ensemble using experimental measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available