4.7 Article

Features and characteristics of publicly available mHealth apps for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Journal

DIGITAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20552076231167007

Keywords

chronic obstructive lung disease; mobile applications; self-management; chronic lung disease; rehabilitation; personalized medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have the potential to assist individuals with COPD in developing self-management skills. However, publicly available COPD apps vary in their designs, features, and overall quality. Currently, these apps lack clinical evidence to support their use.
Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) may be able to support people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to develop the appropriate skills and routines for adequate self-management. Given the wide variety of publicly available mHealth apps, it is important to be aware of their characteristics to optimize their use and mitigate potential harms.Objective: To report the characteristics and features of publicly available apps for COPD self-management.Methods: MHealth apps designed for patients' COPD self-management were searched in the Google Play and Apple app stores. Two reviewers trialed and assessed the eligible apps using the MHealth Index and Navigation Database framework to describe the characteristics, qualities, and features of mHealth apps across five domains.Results: From the Google Play and Apple stores, thirteen apps were identified and eligible for further evaluation. All thirteen apps were available for Android devices, but only seven were available for Apple devices. Most apps were developed by for-profit organizations (8/13), non-profit organizations (2/13), and unknown developers (3/13). Many apps had privacy policies (9/13), but only three apps described their security systems and two mentioned compliance with local health information and data usage laws. Education was the common app feature; additional features were medication reminders, symptom tracking, journaling, and action planning. None provided clinical evidence to support their use.Conclusions: Publicly available COPD apps vary in their designs, features, and overall quality. These apps lack evidence to support their clinical use and cannot be recommended at this time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available