4.4 Article

Prognostic role of pretreatment skeletal muscle index in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Journal

PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/pore.2023.1611055

Keywords

meta-analysis; prognosis; gastric cancer; pretreatment; skeletal muscle index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis study found that there is an association between pretreatment skeletal muscle index (SMI) and long-term survival of gastric cancer patients. Lower pretreatment SMI is associated with poorer survival rates. However, more prospective high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Background: The association between pretreatment skeletal muscle index (SMI) and long-term survival of gastric cancer patients remains unclear up to now. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the prognostic value of pretreatment SMI in gastric cancer.Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases were searched up to 5 June 2022 for relevant studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the second outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the relationship between pretreatment SMI and survival of gastric cancer patients. All statistical analyses were conducted by STATA 15.0 software.Results: A total of 31 retrospective studies involving 12,434 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that lower pretreatment was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.53, p < 0.001). Besides, lower pretreatment SMI was also related with worse DFS (HR = 1.39, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 1.96, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Pretreatment SMI was significantly associated with prognosis of gastric cancer patients and lower SMI predicted worse survival. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify our findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available