3.9 Article

Quantification of the Regional Properties of Gastric Motility Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Images

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3261224

Keywords

Contraction map; gastric motility index; magnetic resonance imaging; motion correction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the regional properties of gastric motility from free-breathing dynamic MRI data. A stomach centerline was generated as a reference axis, and contractions were visualized as spatio-temporal contraction maps. The motility properties varied in different regions of the stomach.
Goal: To quantify the regional properties of gastric motility from free-breathing dynamic MRI data. Methods: Free-breathing MRI scans were performed on 10 healthy human subjects. Motion correction was applied to reduce the respiratory effect. A stomach centerline was automatically generated and used as a reference axis. Contractions were quantified and visualized as spatio-temporal contraction maps. Gastric motility properties were reported separately for the lesser and greater curvatures in the proximal and distal regions of the stomach. Results: Motility properties varied in different regions of the stomach. The mean contraction frequencies for the lesser and greater curvatures were both 3.1 +/- 0.4 cycles per minute. The contraction speed was significantly higher on the greater curvature than the lesser curvature (3.5 +/- 0.7 vs 2.5 +/- 0.4 mm/s, p<0.001) while contraction size on both curvatures was comparable (4.9 +/- 1.2 vs 5.7 +/- 2.4 mm, p = 0.326). The mean gastric motility index was significantly higher in the distal greater curvature (28.13 +/- 18.89 mm(2)/s) compared to the other regions of the stomach (11.16-14.12 mm(2)/s). Conclusions: The results showed the effectiveness of the proposed method for visualization and quantification of motility patterns from MRI data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available