4.6 Article

Uncovering the transcriptional regulatory network involved in boosting wheat regeneration and transformation

Journal

NATURE PLANTS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 908-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41477-023-01406-z

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized a multi-omic analysis strategy to uncover the transcriptional regulatory network responsible for wheat regeneration, identifying 446 key transcription factors driving the process. It also highlighted two DOF transcription factors that can enhance regeneration efficiency in wheat.
Genetic transformation is important for gene functional study and crop improvement. However, it is less effective in wheat. Here we employed a multi-omic analysis strategy to uncover the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) responsible for wheat regeneration. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag techniques were utilized to profile the transcriptional and chromatin dynamics during early regeneration from the scutellum of immature embryos in the wheat variety Fielder. Our results demonstrate that the sequential expression of genes mediating cell fate transition during regeneration is induced by auxin, in coordination with changes in chromatin accessibility, H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 status. The built-up TRN driving wheat regeneration was found to be dominated by 446 key transcription factors (TFs). Further comparisons between wheat and Arabidopsis revealed distinct patterns of DNA binding with one finger (DOF) TFs in the two species. Experimental validations highlighted TaDOF5.6 (TraesCS6A02G274000) and TaDOF3.4 (TraesCS2B02G592600) as potential enhancers of transformation efficiency in different wheat varieties. Wheat functional genomics is limited by low transformation efficiency. This study uncovered the transcriptional regulatory network responsible for wheat regeneration and identified two DOF transcription factors that can enhance regeneration in wheat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available