4.6 Article

Day-Ahead Spatiotemporal Wind Speed Forecasting Based on a Hybrid Model of Quantum and Residual Long Short-Term Memory Optimized by Particle Swarm Algorithm

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2023.3265982

Keywords

Wind speed; Quantum computing; Logic gates; Predictive models; Neural networks; Forecasting; Autoregressive processes; Deep learning; particle swarm optimization (PSO); quantum neural network (QNN); residual long short-term memory (LSTM); wind speed forecasting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a novel hybrid model of quantum and residual long short-term memory (LSTM) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) for day-ahead spatiotemporal wind speed forecasting. The proposed model outperforms numerous machine learning methods and deep learning algorithms in terms of accuracy.
Fluctuations in wind speed result in intermittent wind power generation. In a power grid, wind power intermittency has serious repercussions, including poor system reliability, increased reserve capacity requirement, and increased operating costs. Wind speed must be accurately predicted to enable the day-ahead power market to schedule dispatchable generation resources and determine the market prices. This article proposes a novel hybrid model of quantum and residual long short-term memory (LSTM) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) for day-ahead spatiotemporal wind speed forecasting. The hyperparameters (time series, time lag, dropout rate, and learning rate) and the structure parameter of the residual LSTM are tuned by PSO. To improve the accuracy of the proposed model, a quantum embedding layer is added to the optimized residual-LSTM neural network. According to the test results, the proposed model is highly accurate and outperforms numerous machine learning methods and deep learning algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available