4.7 Article

The impact of investor sentiment on firms' green total factor productivity-facilitator or inhibitor?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 27, Pages 70303-70314

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-27204-w

Keywords

Green total factor productivity; Investor sentiment; High-quality development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research constructs a new indicator to measure firms' green total factor productivity and examines the impact of investor sentiment on this productivity. The study confirms the mediating role of agency costs and financial situations. It also finds that digitization of businesses enhances the effect of investor sentiment on green total factor productivity and that the impact is amplified when managerial competence is at a certain threshold. Heterogeneity tests reveal that high investor sentiment has a stronger impact on green total factor productivity in firms with superior supervision.
Investor sentiment does not only have negative impacts. It may also improve green total factor productivity by invigorating funds. This research constructs a new indicator at the firm level to measure the green total factor productivity of firms. We research the effect of investor sentiment on firms' green total factor productivity using a sample of Chinese heavy polluters listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares between 2015 and 2019. Through a series of tests, the mediating role of agency costs and financial situations is confirmed. It is discovered that the digitization of businesses facilitates the effect of investor sentiment on the green total factor productivity of businesses. And when managerial competence reaches a certain threshold, the impact of investor sentiment on green total factor productivity is amplified. Tests for heterogeneity reveal that high investor sentiment has a larger impact on green total factor productivity in firms with superior supervision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available