4.5 Article

A revisited phylogeography of Nautilus pompilius

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 6, Issue 14, Pages 4924-4935

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2248

Keywords

Indo-Pacific; mitochondrial DNA; Nautilus pompilius; phenotypic plasticity; phylogeography

Funding

  1. Tiffany Co. Foundation [11661]
  2. NSF [DBI-0939454, DGE1256082]
  3. National oceanic and Atmospheric Association [NA12NMF-4690220]
  4. US Fish and Wildlife Service [10170-85-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cephalopod genus Nautilus is considered a living fossil with a contested number of extant and extinct species, and a benthic lifestyle that limits movement of animals between isolated seamounts and landmasses in the Indo-Pacific. Nautiluses are fished for their shells, most heavily in the Philippines, and these fisheries have little monitoring or regulation. Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that multiple species of Nautilus (e.g., N.belauensis, N.repertus and N.stenomphalus) are in fact one species with a diverse phenotypic and geologic range. Using mitochondrial markers, we show that nautiluses from the Philippines, eastern Australia (Great Barrier Reef), Vanuatu, American Samoa, and Fiji fall into distinct geographical clades. For phylogenetic analysis of species complexes across the range of nautilus, we included sequences of Nautilus pompilius and other Nautilus species from GenBank from localities sampled in this study and others. We found that specimens from Western Australia cluster with samples from the Philippines, suggesting that interbreeding may be occurring between those locations, or that there is limited genetic drift due to large effective population sizes. Intriguingly, our data also show that nautilus identified in other studies as N.belauensis, N.stenomphalus, or N.repertus are likely N.pompilius displaying a diversity of morphological characters, suggesting that there is significant phenotypic plasticity within N.pompilius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available