4.5 Review

Lithium-ion battery recycling: a source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the environment?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1015-1030

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2em00511e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is vital for meeting the increasing demand for metals and achieving a sustainable circular economy. However, there is limited knowledge about the environmental risks associated with LIB recycling, particularly the emission of persistent fluorinated substances. This study provides an overview of the use of fluorinated substances in LIBs and highlights the potential formation and release of persistent fluorinated substances during the recycling process. It calls for further investigation and suggests the substitution of PFAS-based materials or changes in process conditions to prevent the formation and emission of persistent fluorinated substances.
Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a rapidly growing industry, which is vital to address the increasing demand for metals, and to achieve a sustainable circular economy. Relatively little information is known about the environmental risks posed by LIB recycling, in particular with regards to the emission of persistent (in)organic fluorinated chemicals. Here we present an overview on the use of fluorinated substances - in particular per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - in state-of-the-art LIBs, along with recycling conditions which may lead to their formation and/or release to the environment. Both organic and inorganic fluorinated substances are widely reported in LIB components, including the electrodes and binder, electrolyte (and additives), and separator. Among the most common substances are LiPF6 (an electrolyte salt), and the polymeric PFAS polyvinylidene fluoride (used as an electrode binder and a separator). Currently the most common LIB recycling process involves pyrometallurgy, which operates at high temperatures (up to 1600 degrees C), sufficient for PFAS mineralization. However, hydrometallurgy, an increasingly popular alternative recycling approach, operates under milder temperatures (<600 degrees C), which could favor incomplete degradation and/or formation and release of persistent fluorinated substances. This is supported by the wide range of fluorinated substances detected in bench-scale LIB recycling experiments. Overall, this review highlights the need to further investigate emissions of fluorinated substances during LIB recycling and suggests that substitution of PFAS-based materials (i.e. during manufacturing), or alternatively post-treatments and/or changes in process conditions may be required to avoid formation and emission of persistent fluorinated substances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available