4.1 Article

When ADHD knocks on the door - discourse theory as a frame to explore subject positions and mental wellbeing before diagnosis

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2209964

Keywords

ADHD; discourse analysis; subject positions; emotional needs; societal norms; wellbeing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines how 10 young adults in Norway positioned themselves before being diagnosed with ADHD. The study identified six central subject positions, related to schoolwork struggles and difficulties in social interaction. The findings shed light on the emotional and environmental needs of individuals with ADHD and the societal norms they face, regardless of a formal diagnosis.
Purpose Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is currently the most prevalent childhood psychiatric diagnosis. This article reports how 10 young adults in Norway positioned themselves before they were diagnosed with ADHD either during early childhood or adolescence. A central theme is how these subject-positions relate to societal norms and mental well-being. Method Individual interviews were conducted, and the transcriptions of the interviews were analysed according to discourse theory. Result Six central subject positions were identified which in turn related to two major positions: 1) failure with schoolwork and 2) struggle in social interaction. The findings indicated specific emotional and environmental needs and that individuals were confronted with societal norms related to the criteria for ADHD prior to and regardless of whether one had received a formal diagnosis. Conclusion We argue that analysing subject positions provides important knowledge regarding ADHD that is useful for individuals, parents, teachers, practitioners, policymakers, and helping professionals in the field of mental health and education when it comes to interventions that support children who possess different temperaments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available