4.4 Article

Efficacy of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 408, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02937-x

Keywords

Intravenous; Lidocaine; Laparoscopic; Cholecystectomy; Analgesia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 98 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included and randomized. The study found that lidocaine did not reduce postoperative opioid consumption and had no effect on postoperative pain scores, incidence of shoulder pain, sedation levels, and nausea rates.
PurposeWe designed this study to evaluate the impact of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MethodsIn total, 98 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included and randomized. In the experimental group, intravenous lidocaine (bolus 1.5 mg/kg and continuous infusion 2 mg/kg/h) was administered intraoperatively additionally to the standard analgesia, whereas the control group received a matching placebo. Blinding existed at the level of both the patient and the investigator.ResultsOur study failed to confirm any benefit in opioid consumption, during the postoperative period. Lidocaine resulted to reduced intraoperative systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure. Lidocaine administration did not change postoperative pain scores or the incidence of shoulder pain, at any time endpoint. Moreover, we did not identify any difference in terms of postoperative sedation levels and nausea rates.ConclusionOverall, lidocaine did not have any effect on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available