4.5 Article

Study on Modified Water Permeability Method for Fly Ash Concrete in Comparison with DIN 1048 (Part 5)

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 48, Issue 10, Pages 13337-13352

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-023-07831-8

Keywords

Permeability; Water penetration depth; Concrete; Fly ash; Durability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary cause of concrete deterioration is water permeability through it. Different codes of practices are used to study this, but they have limitations such as long testing duration and undetectable penetration for high-strength concrete. Therefore, a new method called Modified water permeability is proposed in this article.
The primary cause of concrete deterioration is water permeability through it, which is typically studied using different codes of practices (German, European, and Indian standard codes). It has limitations such as long testing duration, equipment consuming large space, full penetration for low-strength concrete, and undetectable penetration for high-strength concrete. As a result of recognizing the need for a new method for testing low-strength concrete, this article presents a new approach called Modified water permeability. To check the viability of the Modified method, the concrete mix is designed with and without fly ash based on cementing efficiency approach. The addition of fly ash has shown enhancement in resisting water penetration through concrete. The water penetration depth was reduced by around 10-48% with the addition of different percentages of fly ash, for effective w/c between 0.33 and 0.54. However, for low-strength concrete, the traditional method has shown complete water penetration. These specimens were tested effectively using a modified method. The improvement due to the addition of fly ash was observed in all strength ranges. For validation, the traditional and modified water permeability test results of standard concrete were correlated, which reveals a significant and logical trend. Moreover, the results revealed that the modified method is appropriate for both ordinary and standard concrete.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available