Relative Bioavailability of Apixaban Solution or Crushed Tablet Formulations Administered by Mouth or Nasogastric Tube in Healthy Subjects

Purpose: Crushed tablet and solution formulations of apixaban administered orally or via a nasogastric tube (NGT) may be useful in patients unable to swallow solid dose formulations. It is important to understand whether new formulations and/or methods of administration impact apixaban bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties. These studies evaluated the relative bioavailability (F-rel) of apixaban solution administered orally; oral solution administered via NGT flushed with either 5% dextrose in water (D5W) or with infant formula; oral solution via NGT with a nutritional supplement; and crushed tablet suspended in D5W and administered via NGT. Methods: Three open-label, randomized, crossover studies were conducted in healthy adults (study 1: apixaban 10-mg tablet [reference] versus oral solution, both administered PO; study 2: apixaban 5-mg oral solution PO [reference] versus oral solution via NGT flushed with either D5W or infant formula; study 3: apixaban 5-mg oral solution PO [reference] versus apixaban 5-mg oral solution via NGT with a nutritional supplement and versus crushed tablet suspended in D5W and administered via NGT). Point estimates and 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) were generated for C-max and AUC. Adverse events were recorded throughout each study. Findings: F-rel of the oral solution was 105% versus tablet, and F-rel for oral solution via NGT with D5W flush, infant formula flush, nutritional supplement, and crushed tablet via NGT versus oral solution administration were 96.7%, 92.2%, 81.3%, and 95.1%, respectively. The 90% CIs of the GMRs of all AUCs met the bioequivalence criterion except that of the nutritional supplement (0.766-0.863). The corresponding GMRs for C-max were 0.977, 0.953, 0.805, 0.682, and 0.884. For the solution via NGT flushed with D5W and for the crushed tablet, the 90% CIs of the C-max GMRs met the bioequivalence criterion. Apixaban was well tolerated in all 3 studies; most adverse events were mild. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.