Cretaceous source to sink system reconstruction of northeastern Asian continental margin: Insight from integrated detrital geochronology in NE China

The Cretaceous sedimentary successions in NE China are largely incomplete as the basins are inverted and younger strata are eroded. Except for the Songliao Basin, whose depositional record has remained relatively intact, the burial record to the east was interrupted in the late Early or Late Cretaceous. There is still controversy on the possible connection between the Songliao Basin and the eastern basin group, as well as the extent of the previously suggested pan-Sanjiang proto-basin that covered most current eastern satellite basins. To address these questions, we studied modern river catchments of variable sizes from sediment-supplying basement highs that cover most of eastern NE China to track the intense denudation events and provenance changes through the Cretaceous. We found a great inconsistency between detrital age patterns of the modern river sands and the spatial proportions of the source units. The detrital age distributions allow to re-evaluate the basement units that are mostly composed of the Triassic-Jurassic igneous suite and some metasedimentary units with Paleozoic ages, but the contribution from Proterozoic formations is negligible. Combining the newly dated modern catchment detrital U-Pb ages, the region-wide compilation of the basement emplacement ages, and the U-Pb ages in the Cretaceous formations in NE China, we systematically refine the Cretaceous provenance history. In the Early Cretaceous, the eastern satellite basins accumulated sediments from the Lesser Xing'an range (LXR) in the west, Zhangguangcai range (ZGCR) in the south, and the Nadanhada terrane (NT) in the east. The sediment of the southern Songliao Basin derived from the North China Craton (NCC) and from ZGCR but barely from the Great Xing'an Range (GXR). The Jiamusi uplift (JU) did not provide sediments to the eastern satellite basins and the Songliao Basin. In the Late Cretaceous, the eastern satellite basins received sediments from the exhumed JU but barely from ZGCR and LXR. The Songliao Basin still accumulated the sediments from the NCC, some south part of ZGCR, and GXR but minor from the central and northern ZGCR and LXR. Between the latest Early Cretaceous and early Late Cretaceous, a much wider proto-basin was suggested in NE China than previously assumed. It covered during its maximum extension period the current Songliao Basin, the eastern satellite basins, the LXR, ZGCR, JU, and partial GXR basement areas. The provenance change is induced by the Paleo-Pacific plate motion change, i.e., with the subduction direction change, the roll-back, and twostage limited flat slab subduction trigged the formation of the basin-and-range system in NE China since the Early Cretaceous. Moreover, we suggest conducting modern sand provenance analysis to detect, verify or re-classify the ages of the zircon-bearing units, especially at a reconnaissance prospecting on areas covered by imprecise large-scale geological maps only to reveal the catchment better. (c) 2023 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Automated summary

The Cretaceous sedimentary successions in NE China are largely incomplete due to basin inversion and erosion of younger strata. The connection between the Songliao Basin and the eastern basin group is still debated, as well as the extent of the pan-Sanjiang proto-basin. The study of modern river catchments reveals inconsistencies between detrital age patterns and spatial proportions of source units, leading to a refined Cretaceous provenance history.