4.4 Article

Trauma-Informed Approaches in Primary Healthcare and Community Mental Healthcare: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Organisational Change Interventions

Journal

HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY
Volume 2023, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/4475114

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A trauma-informed approach is a framework for addressing trauma's prevalence and impact. This review assessed the effects of trauma-informed approaches on healthcare providers and adult patients in primary care and community mental healthcare. The evidence for intervention effects was limited and conflicting, with some studies reporting improvements in provider readiness and patient readiness for disease management, while others reported conflicting effects on provider behavior and patient satisfaction. The intervention mechanisms included varied components, tailoring to organizational needs, staff education and self-care, creating safe environments, and shared decision-making. Contextual and intervention factors moderated the intervention effects. More methodologically robust evaluations are needed.
A trauma-informed approach is a framework for organisational (synonym system) change interventions that address the universal prevalence and impact of trauma. This mixed methods systematic review assessed the effects of trauma-informed approaches on psychological, behavioural, and health outcomes in health-care providers and adult patients in primary care and community mental healthcare. We searched five databases and grey literature and consulted experts for reports published in January 1990 to June 2021. The quantitative descriptive and qualitative framework syntheses were integrated through a line of argument and mapped onto a logic model. We included six nonrandomised studies that evaluated eight interventions with varied theoretical developments, components, and outcomes. The most common components were budget allocation, workforce development, identification/response to violence and trauma, and evaluation. Evidence for intervention effects was limited and conflicting. Four studies reported improvement in provider readiness and sense of community, while three reported conflicting effects on provider behaviour regarding delivery of trauma-informed care. Four studies reported some improvement in patient readiness for disease management and access to services; however, the evidence for patient satisfaction was conflicting. Two studies found that patients and providers felt safe. While one study reported improvement in patient quality of life and chronic pain, another found no effect on substance use, and three studies reported conflicting effects on mental health. Intervention mechanisms included a package of varied components, tailoring to the organisational needs, capacities and preferences, staff education and self-care, creating safe environments, and shared decision-making. Intervention effects were moderated by contextual (health system values, policies, governance, business models, trauma-informed movement, organisational culture, and social determinants of health) and intervention factors (buy-in from all staff, collective learning through conversations, equal attention to staff and patient well-being, and sustainable funding). No studies measured adverse events/harm, cost effectiveness, or providers' health. We need more methodologically robust evaluations of trauma-informed organisational change interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available