4.7 Article

Statistical process control of assembly lines in manufacturing

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2023.100435

Keywords

Automated statistical process control; Six sigma; ANOVA gage reproducibility & repeatability; Automated data collection; Instrument validation; Measurement system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data collection can be time-consuming, but automation can bring multiple benefits. This paper proposes re-engineered solutions for automating data collection in four different situations, enabled by information integration. The case studies involve Statistical Process Control for quality management purposes on a filling machine, with the validation of systems and instruments using the ANOVA Gage Reproducibility & Repeatability method.
Data collection is often a time-consuming activity and sometimes real-time required. Moving to automation could bring multiple benefits, but sometimes it may not be convenient. In this paper four different situations are analyzed, and for each of them a re-engineered solution enabled by information integration for automating the data collection, if applicable, is proposed. More into detail, the data collection is performed so as to apply a Statistical Process Control for quality management purposes on four different operations, taken as case studies and carried out on a filling machine produced by an Italian company. Statistical Process Control consists in determining two process capability indexes whose values, for completeness, are then compared with the relating Six Sigma level. One of the peculiarities of these case studies is that before collecting the measurements, the systems and instruments were validated through the ANOVA Gage Reproducibility & Repeatability method. This is somehow an innovative procedure, since quite often the preliminary validation step is neglected, thus involving the risk of inaccurate and distorted outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available