4.8 Article

FANCD2 Maintains Fork Stability in BRCA1/2-Deficient Tumors and Promotes Alternative End-Joining DNA Repair

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 2488-2499

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ovarian Cancer Research Fellowship (OCRF) Ann Shreiber Mentored Investigator Award
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) Fellowship
  3. Claudia Adams Barr Program award
  4. Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) - Ovarian Cancer Research Fund-Ovarian Cancer National Alliance-National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT16-15]
  5. American Association for Cancer Research
  6. NIH [R01DK43889, R37HL052725]
  7. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  8. Fanconi Anemia Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BRCA1/2 proteins function in homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair and cooperate with Fanconi anemia (FA) proteins to maintain genomic integrity through replication fork stabilization. Loss of BRCA1/2 proteins results in DNA repair deficiency and replicative stress, leading to genomic instability and enhanced sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Recent studies have shown that BRCA1/2deficient tumors upregulate Polq-mediated alternative end-joining (alt-EJ) repair as a survival mechanism. Whether other mechanisms maintain genomic integrity upon loss of BRCA1/2 proteins is currently unknown. Here we show that BRCA1/2-deficient tumors also upregulate FANCD2 activity. FANCD2 is required for fork protection and fork restart in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors. Moreover, FANCD2 promotes Polq recruitment at sites of damage and altEJ repair. Finally, loss of FANCD2 in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors enhances cell death. These results reveal a synthetic lethal relationship between FANCD2 and BRCA1/2, and they identify FANCD2 as a central player orchestrating DNA repair pathway choice at the replication fork.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available