4.8 Article

High-Resolution Mapping of RNA Polymerases Identifies Mechanisms of Sensitivity and Resistance to BET Inhibitors in t(8;21) AML

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 2003-2016

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.032

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. T. J. Martell Foundation
  2. Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation
  3. NIH [RO1-CA109355, RO1-CA164605, RO1-GM25232, R01-CA64140]
  4. Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research grant [NIDDK P30DK58404]
  5. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center support grant [NCI P30CA68485]
  6. American Cancer Society [5 T32 CA009582-26, PF-13-303-01-DMC]
  7. National Center for Research Resources [UL1 RR024975-01]
  8. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [2 UL1 TR000445-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) family inhibitors offer an approach to treating hematological malignancies. We used precision nuclear run-on transcription sequencing (PRO-seq) to create high-resolution maps of active RNA polymerases across the genome in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as these polymerases are exceptionally sensitive to BET inhibitors. PRO-seq identified over 1,400 genes showing impaired release of promoter-proximal paused RNA polymerases, including the stem cell factor receptor tyrosine kinase KIT that is mutated in t(8; 21) AML. PRO-seq also identified an enhancer 30 to KIT. Chromosome conformation capture confirmed contacts between this enhancer and the KIT promoter, while CRISPRi-mediated repression of this enhancer impaired cell growth. PROseq also identified microRNAs, including MIR29C and MIR29B2, that target the anti-apoptotic factor MCL1 and were repressed by BET inhibitors. MCL1 protein was upregulated, and inhibition of BET proteins sensitized t(8:21)-containing cells to MCL1 inhibition, suggesting a potential mechanism of resistance to BET-inhibitor-induced cell death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available