4.8 Article

Metagenomic Sequencing with Strain-Level Resolution Implicates Uropathogenic E-coli in Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Mortality in Preterm Infants

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 2912-2924

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.015

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme under Research Executive Agency grant [PCIG13-GA-2013-618833]
  2. Centre for Integrative Biology (University of Trento)
  3. MIUR Futuro in Ricerca [RBFR13EWWI_001]
  4. Fondazione Caritro
  5. NIH [R01HD059140, P01HD13021, HD27853]
  6. National Center for Research Resources [5UL1RR026314-03, U54HG004969]
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
  8. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272200900018C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) afflicts approximately 10% of extremely preterm infants with high fatality. Inappropriate bacterial colonization with Enterobacteriaceae is implicated, but no specific pathogen has been identified. We identify uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) colonization as a significant risk factor for the development of NEC and subsequent mortality. We describe a large-scale deep shotgun metagenomic sequence analysis of the early intestinal microbiome of 144 preterm and 22 term infants. Using a pan-genomic approach to functionally subtype the E. coli, we identify genes associated with NEC and mortality that indicate colonization by UPEC. Metagenomic multilocus sequence typing analysis further defined NEC-associated strains as sequence types often associated with urinary tract infections, including ST69, ST73, ST95, ST127, ST131, and ST144. Although other factors associated with prematurity may also contribute, this report suggests a link between UPEC and NEC and indicates that further attention to these sequence types as potential causal agents is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available