4.7 Article

Chemical reduction as a facile colorimetric approach for selective TNT detection by spectrophotometry and photothermal lens spectroscopy

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talarna.2023.124334

Keywords

2; 4; 6-Trinitrotoluene; Chemical reduction; Photothermal lens; Colorimetric reagent; TNT vapor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a simple method for determining TNT using NaBH4 as a reducing/colorimetric reagent. The method is able to differentiate TNT from other nitroaromatic compounds through time-dependent selectivity. UV-vis spectrophotometry and photothermal lens spectrometry were employed as detection techniques, with the latter providing higher sensitivity.
In this study, the simple determination of TNT is achieved through the vivid stable red color products generated after chemically reduction by NaBH4 as a common and accessible reducing/colorimetric reagent. Some other nitroaromatics were impressed under reduction reaction and led to the colorful products. The color of these reduced nitroaromatics were unstable and approximately vanished after some few minutes which ameliorated the selectivity in TNT determination. Utilizing the time-dependent selectivity, the method was applied specifically for discriminating of TNT from other nitroaromatic compounds (NACs). UV-vis spectrophotometry and photothermal lens spectrometry were employed as detection techniques. The former was simpler and more available in various laboratories while the latter provides higher sensitivity. It was revealed that the photothermal lens responses were linear from 2.0 to 55.0 nM with a limit of detection (LOD) of about 0.8 nM. The LOD of the photothermal lens measurement were found to be 241 times lower than that of the UV-vis spectrophotometry in TNT quantification. The evolved method was successfully carried out for TNT vapor determination after trapping into the colorimetric reagent. The recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSD, n = 3) calculated for 3 gas samples were >= 91% and <= 7%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available