4.2 Review

Antibiotic Use in Dental Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040713

Keywords

antibiotic prophylaxis in dentistry; dental implant placement; pre-operative antibiotics and post-operative complications; dental implant failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic review of 12 RCTs and found that prophylactic antibiotic use is not sufficiently effective in reducing postoperative infections after dental implant placements. Therefore, routine use of antibiotics is not recommended in dental implant procedures.
Background and Objectives: This project was developed from anecdotal evidence of varied practices around antibiotic prescribing in dental procedures. The aim of the study was to ascertain if there is evidence to support whether antibiotic (AB) use can effectively reduce postoperative infections after dental implant placements (DIPs). Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA-P (c) methodology, a systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials was designed and registered on the PROSPERO (c) database. Searches were performed using PubMed((R)), Science Direct((R)) and the Cochrane (c) Database, plus the bibliographies of studies identified. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics, independent of the regimen used, versus a placebo, control or no therapy based on implant failure due to infection was the primary measured outcome. Secondary outcomes were other post-surgical complications due to infection and AB adverse events. Results: Twelve RCTs were identified and analysed. Antibiotic use was reported to be statistically significant in preventing infection (p < 001). The prevention of complications was not statistically significant (p = 0.96), and the NNT was >5 (14 and 2523 respectively), which indicates that the intervention was not sufficiently effective to justify its use. The occurrence of side effects was not statistically significant (p = 0.63). NNH was 528 indicating that possible harm caused by the use of ABs is very small and does not negate the AB use when indicated. Conclusion: The routine use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infection in dental implant placement was found to be not sufficiently effective to justify routine use. Clear clinical assessment pathways, such as those used for medical conditions, based on the patients' age, dental risk factors, such as oral health and bone health, physical risk factors, such as chronic or long-term conditions and modifiable health determinants, such as smoking, are required to prevent the unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available