4.7 Article

An unmixing-based BRDF correction in spectral remote sensing data

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103161

Keywords

Spectral remote sensing; Spectral unmixing; Hyperspectral Imaging; Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function; (BRDF)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of spectral mixture on the correction of the Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) effect and proposes an unmixing-based model to improve the correction accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms the traditional method in reducing the BRDF effect.
While extensive research addressed the Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) effect and ap-proaches to correct it, too few works have considered the influence of spectral mixture on the correction results.This work studies the BRDF effect in spectral data and presents an approach to correct its undesired impact, considering the likely presence of mixed pixels. We propose an unmixing-based semiempirical model, incorpo-rating endmembers' (EMs) fractions within the data correction.To evaluate the performance of the proposed methodology, we conducted experiments with laboratory and aerial hyperspectral image data. The outcomes from all experiments reveal vital insights into the influence of the spectral mixture on the BRDF correction accuracy. Nevertheless, the results clearly show that the accuracy of the corrected reflectance significantly improved using the proposed model for reducing the BRDF effect, regardless of the pixel's microtopography arrangement.Most importantly, a quantitative assessment of the difference in reflectance values within the overlapping region between two aerial images shows that the unmixing-based model outperforms the commonly used one.While the traditional method reduces the influence of the BRDF in the corrected data by a factor of two, with an average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of approximate to 2.5%, the proposed approach reduces it by a factor of four with an average MAE approximate to 1.2%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available