4.8 Article

Compartmentalized Epidermal Activation of β-Catenin Differentially Affects Lineage Reprogramming and Underlies Tumor Heterogeneity

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 269-281

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.041

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  2. King's College London
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) [G1100073]
  4. Wellcome Trust [096540/Z/11/Z]
  5. European Union Framework 7 programme (HEALING)
  6. MRC
  7. EU-FP7 (HEALING)
  8. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  9. MRC [MR/L022699/1, G1100073] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [096540/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/L022699/1, MC_PC_12009, G1100073] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wnt/beta-catenin activation in adult epidermis can induce new hair follicle formation and tumor development. We used lineage tracing to uncover the relative contribution of different stem cell populations. LGR6(+) and LRIG1(+) stem cells contributed to ectopic hair follicles formed in the sebaceous gland upon beta-catenin activation, whereas LGR5(+) cells did not. Lgr6, but not Lrig1 or Lgr5, was expressed in a subpopulation of interfollicular epidermal cells that were competent to form new hair follicles. Oncogenic beta-catenin expression in LGR5(+) cells led to formation of pilomatricomas, while LRIG1(+) cells formed trichoadenomas and LGR6(+) cells formed dermatofibromas. Tumor formation was always accompanied by a local increase in dermal fibroblast density and transient extracellular matrix remodeling. However, each tumor had a distinct stromal signature in terms of immune cell infiltrate and expression of CD26 and CD44. We conclude that compartmentalization of epidermal stem cells underlies different responses to beta-catenin and skin tumor heterogeneity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available