4.0 Article

Knowledge on human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV screening and HPV vaccine among sexual health clinic patients in Martinique, French West Indies

Journal

INFECTIOUS DISEASES NOW
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.idnow.2022.11.003

Keywords

HPV screening; HPV vaccine; HPV knowledge; Caribbean Islands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge about HPV among a population attending a sexual health clinic in the University Hospital of Martinique. A validated questionnaire was used to survey 500 young adults, and the results indicated that 68% of participants had never heard of HPV, with the percentage rising to 74.6% among women. The median number of correct answers out of 28 questions was 15, and there was no significant difference related to age. Women had more correct answers on most of the items related to screening and vaccine. The study highlights the poor knowledge about HPV in Martinique and the need for new communication methods to reach young boys and girls.
Objectives: To assess the level of knowledge about HPV in a population attending a sexual health clinic in the University Hospital of Martinique. Methods: Cross sectional observational study based on a validated questionnaire among 500 young adults between June 2020 and March 2021. First question was Have you ever heard of HPV?. If the answer was Yes, the person was invited to answer the next 28 questions. Results: Overall, 68% of participants had never heard of HPV, rising to 74.6% of women. Out of 28 questions, the median of correct answers by participants was 15 (IQR 8-19). We did not find any difference related to age. Women had more correct answers than men on most of the items related to screening and vaccine. Conclusion: In Martinique, knowledge about HPV is poor. New communication methods are required to reach young boys and girls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available