4.7 Article

Various ways of using empirical orthogonal functions for climate model evaluation

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

Common EOFs: a tool for multi-model comparison and evaluation

Abdel Hannachi et al.

Summary: With the increasing volume of climate model simulations, there is a need for efficient methods for model comparison and evaluation. This study discusses a common method for empirical orthogonal function analysis, which can be used for this purpose. The method is applied to various atmospheric fields from reanalysis products and CMIP6 model simulations, revealing consistency and differences between the datasets.

CLIMATE DYNAMICS (2023)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

Cloud Climatologies from Global Climate Models-A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models with Satellite Data

Axel Lauer et al.

Summary: Simulating clouds in global climate models is challenging due to the complex physics involved. Evaluating cloud performance is crucial for assessing climate projections. Results show that CMIP6 performs slightly better than CMIP5 in terms of cloud parameters, but the intermodel spread remains unchanged. CMIP5/6 models overestimate cloud ice, particularly in the lower and middle troposphere, but this bias is reduced in CMIP6.

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE (2023)

Article Astronomy & Astrophysics

How to Recognize a True Mode of Atmospheric Circulation Variability

Radan Huth et al.

Summary: It has been demonstrated that unrotated principal component analysis (PCA) in detecting modes of atmospheric circulation variability may lead to artificial patterns rather than true modes. While the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) defined by rotated PCA corresponds well to underlying autocorrelation structures, other modes like Arctic Oscillation (AO), Barents Oscillation (BO), and the summer East Atlantic (SEA) pattern defined by unrotated PCA do not show good correspondence with underlying structures and are sensitive to spatial and temporal choices. Careful interpretation of PCA outputs, comparison with spatial autocorrelations, and checks for spatial and temporal stability are necessary to distinguish true modes from statistical artifacts.

EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE (2021)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0-diagnostics for extreme events, regional and impact evaluation, and analysis of Earth system models in CMIP

Katja Weigel et al.

Summary: This paper introduces new diagnostic tools for the Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0, covering the hydrological cycle, extreme events, impact assessment, regional evaluations, and ensemble member selection.

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT (2021)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

The ERA5 global reanalysis

Hans Hersbach et al.

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

GCMeval - An interactive tool for evaluation and selection of climate model ensembles

Kajsa M. Parding et al.

CLIMATE SERVICES (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

A simple equation to study changes in rainfall statistics

Rasmus E. Benestad et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2019)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

Using statistical downscaling to assess skill of decadal predictions

Rasmus Benestad et al.

TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY (2019)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Interdependency in Multimodel Climate Projections: Component Replication and Result Similarity

Julien Boe

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

New vigour involving statisticians to overcome ensemble fatigue

Rasmus Benestad et al.

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2017)

Article Environmental Sciences

Climate change and projections for the Barents region: what is expected to change and what will stay the same?

Rasmus E. Benestad et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2016)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

Veronika Eyring et al.

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT (2016)

Article Engineering, Electrical & Electronic

Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications

Andrzej Cichocki et al.

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE (2015)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

A Representative Democracy to Reduce Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble

Benjamin M. Sanderson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE (2015)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

AN OVERVIEW OF CMIP5 AND THE EXPERIMENT DESIGN

Karl E. Taylor et al.

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY (2012)

Article Environmental Sciences

Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate

Clara Deser et al.

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2012)

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

Empirically downscaled temperature scenarios for Svalbard

R. E. Benestad et al.

ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS (2002)

Article Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences

A comparison between two empirical downscaling strategies

RE Benestad

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY (2001)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

The influence of subseasonal wind variability on Tropical Instability Waves in the Pacific

RE Benestad et al.

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2001)