4.7 Article

On the super positron-acoustic rogue waves in q-nonextensive magnetoplasmas

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0144915

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This investigation explores the modulation of weakly positron-acoustic waves (PAWs) in four-component magnetoplasmas with nonextensive electrons and fluid positrons. The researchers derived the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLSE) for the PAWs using the derivative expansion technique. Through linear stability analysis, the modulational instability (MI) in the current magnetoplasma model was studied, and it was found that the magnetic field parameter significantly affects the bandwidth and maximum amplitude of the MI. The obtained results have implications for understanding the acceleration mechanism of static electrostatic wave packets in various plasma environments.
In this investigation, the modulation of weakly positron-acoustic waves (PAWs) in four-component magnetoplasmas having nonextensive electrons and fluid positrons is reported. Using the derivative expansion technique, the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLSE) for the PAWs is derived. In the current magnetoplasma model, the modulational instability (MI) is studied using the linear stability analysis. It is found that the magnetic field parameter contributes to considerably heighten the bandwidth and maximum amplitude of the MI. On the contrary, increasing the hot-to-cold positron density ratio, the electron-to-cold positron density ratio, and the nonextensive parameter leads to diminish the MI maximum amplitude. Within the unstable region, the propagation of the fundamental rogue waves (RWs) and super-RWs solutions of the NLSE are pointed out, whose properties are strongly impacted by the plasma parameter. The obtained results can be used for explaining the acceleration mechanism of static electrostatic wave packets appearing in the auroral region, Earth's ionosphere, and solar wind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available