3.8 Review

Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 113-126

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6

Keywords

Tele-neuropsychology; Remote assessment; Pediatric; Cognition; Testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coronavirus pandemic has highlighted the need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment, but there is limited research on reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This systematic review examined the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of pediatric TeleNP. Most studies found that TeleNP was feasible and acceptable, with no significant differences compared to in-person assessments in most cognitive domains. However, there was limited reporting on demographic factors and the quality of the literature could be improved.
The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to examine the feasibility of pediatric TeleNP assessment alongside (1) patient/family acceptability, (2) reliability, and (3) the quality of the literature. Between May 2021 and November 2022, manual searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were conducted using terms related to pediatric and tele-neuropsychology. After extracting relevant papers with samples aged 0-22 years, predefined exclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was completed using the AXIS appraisal tool (91% rater-agreement). Twenty-one studies were included in the review, with reported qualitative and quantitative data on the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability extracted. Across included studies, TeleNP was completed via telephone/video conference with participants either at home, in a local setting accompanied by an assistant, or in a different room but in the same building as the assessor. Pediatric TeleNP was generally reported to be feasible (e.g., minimal behavioral differences) and acceptable (e.g., positive feedback). Nineteen studies conducted some statistical analyses to assess reliability. Most observed no significant difference between in-person and TeleNP for most cognitive domains (i.e., IQ), with a minority finding variable reliability for some tests (e.g., attention, speech, visuo-spatial). Limited reporting of sex-assigned birth, racialized identity, and ethnicity reduced the quality and generalizability of the literature. To aid clinical interpretations, studies should assess underexamined cognitive domains (e.g., processing speed) with larger, more inclusive samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available